Course Content
(Demo Class) Quantitative Aptitude – CLAT UG
0/1
Demo Class – CLAT UG 2026
About Lesson
Analytical Reasoning - Class 1 - Syllogisms

Question 1: Which of the conclusions given below logically follows from the statements?

  • Premise 1: All cats are mammals.
  • Premise 2: No mammals are cold-blooded animals.
  • Conclusions I: No cats are cold-blooded animals.
  • Conclusions II: Some cats are cold-blooded animals.

Question 2: Which of the conclusions given below logically follows from the statements?

  • Premise 1: All apples are fruits.
  • Premise 2: Some apples are red
  • Conclusions I: Some fruits are red.
  • Conclusions II: All fruits are apples.

Question 3: Consider the following statements and conclusions. Which conclusions (if any) follow logically from the two statements?

  • Premise 1: All poets are dreamers.
  • Premise 2: Some dreamers are writers.
  • Conclusions I: Some writers are poets.
  • Conclusions II: Some poets are writers.

Question 4: Statements: All lions are animals. Some animals are herbivores. Proposed Conclusion: “Some lions are herbivores.”
Based on the two statements, which of the following is correct regarding the proposed conclusion?

Question 5: Statements: All P are Q. All Q are R. Some R are not S.
Which one of the following conclusions must be true based on the above statements?

Question 6: Which of the conclusions given below logically follows from the statements?

  • Premise 1: All dogs are animals.
  • Premise 2: Some animals are wild.
  • Premise 3: All wild animals are dangerous.
  • Conclusions I: Some animals are dangerous.
  • Conclusions II: Some dogs are dangerous.

Question 7: Which of the conclusions given below logically follows from the statements?

  • Premise 1: All windows are glass.
  • Premise 2: No bottle is a window.
  • Conclusions I: Some bottles are glass.
  • Conclusions II: Some glass items are not bottles.

Question 8: Which of the conclusions given below logically follows from the statements?

  • Premise 1: No teacher is a lawyer.
  • Premise 2: Some professionals are teachers.
  • Conclusions I:  No lawyer is a teacher.
  • Conclusions II: Some professionals are not lawyers.

Question 9: Statements: No X are Y. No Y are Z. Question: Based on these statements, which of the following conclusions is correct?

Question 10: Which of the conclusions given below logically follows from the statements?

  • Premise 1: Some artists are painters.
  • Premise 2: All painters are sculptors.
  • Premise 3: No sculptor is a writer.
  • Conclusions I: No painter is a writer.
  • Conclusions II: Some artists are not writers.